HET Mid-Trimester Report
Third Period of 2002
August 1 - September 30

This report is composed of five sections:
Instrument Status

In this section we will discuss the status of each instrument and any limitation to configurations that occurred during the period.


Observing Statistics

The image quality of the HET has improved a bit over last year.

For comparison here is the image quality for the same period of 2001

Here are the DIMM values reported in the night report. NOTE: There are a large number of nights when the DIMM was not operated; there is also times when the DIMM failed due to wind shake or extremely bad seeing.

Month by Month Summary

Month A:Fraction of the Time that was Possible Science B:Average Night Length C:Fraction of Time Lost due to Weather D:Fraction of Science Time Lost due to Alignment E:Fraction of Science Time Lost due to Calibrations F:Fraction of Science Time Lost due to Problems
August 0.884 7:52 0.38 0.24 0.02 0.09
September 0.843 8:56 0.27 0.13 0.04 0.53

The total number of 386 acceptable shutter open science exposures during this period for a total of 55.3 hours. There were a number of rejected spectra obtained during this period as well the following table give the total number of rejected spectra and the category that each falls into.

Number of TimesTime Lost (Hours)Type
111.9 E - Rejected by RA for Equipment Failure
20.5 H - Rejected by RA for Human failure
183.4 W - Rejected by RA for Weather
10.6 P - Rejected by PI and confirmed by RA
00.0 Q - Rejected due to error in the queue
00.0 C - Acceptable by RA but PI rejects
00.0 N - Acceptable but NOT charged due to weather or hole in queue
263.2 B - Acceptable but Border line conditions

So this is a total of 6.4 hours of rejected spectra with an additional possible 3.2 hours of spectra that may be rejected.

This was the first period that we have kept accurate statistics on the overhead for each science visit. This overhead includes slew, setup, and readout (if there are multiple exposures per visit). In the summary page for each program the average setup time is calculated. The table below gives the average setup time for each instrument and the average and maximum science exposures.

Instrument Avg Overhead (min) Avg Exposure (sec)Max Exposure (sec)
LRS 12.4 829.82222
HRS 11.5 833.01800


Observing Programs Status

The following links give the summary for each institution and its programs. The resulting table will give (for each program) the total number of targets in the queue and the number completed, and will give the CCD shutter open hours, 10 minute overhead per visit, and the TAC allocated time. This usually will be the best metric for judging completeness but there are times when a PI will tell us that a target is "done" before the total number of visits is complete.


Institution Status

The following is a summary of the Acceptable CCD shutter time for each institution based on our htopx data base. It does not include any overhead.

Time Usage by Institution (hours)
-TOTAL- Used % of All
PSU 11.236 15.4
UT 51.664 72.9
Stanford 6.500 8.9
Munich 0.000 0.0
Goetting 2.000 2.7
NOAO 3.383 --
SALT 0.000 --
DDT 0.000 --

This is how each institution has allocated its time by priority.

Time Allocation by Institution (hours)
Institution Priority 0 Priority 1 Priority 2Priority 3 Priority 4
PSU 3.000 (3%) 31.500 (30%) 35.000 (34%) 35.000 (34%) 0.000
UT 19.200 (10%) 51.000 (26%)101.500 (51%) 27.000 (14%) 0.000
Stanford 0.000 5.000 (24%) 12.000 (57%) 3.000 (14%) 1.000(5%)
Munich 0.000 4.083 (41%) 2.917 (29%) 3.000 (30%) 0.000
Goetting 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000
NOAO 0.000 53.700 (56%) 42.600 (44%) 0.000 0.000
SALT 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000
DDT 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000


Future Priorities

The following are the high priority targets for the rest of the period for each institution:

UT02-2
RankProgram Constraints
1 UT02-3-010 HRS, many synoptic visits for 2 different targets, Vsky > 20.3 ,EE50 < 2.0
2 UT02-3-002, N6702 LRS, 1 track, photometric , Vsky > 21.0, EE50 < 4.0
3 UT02-3-012, GJ623, GJ87 HRS, 3 tracks, Vsky > 20.0, EE50 < 2.5

PSU02-2
RankProgramConstraints
1 PSU02-2-053 LRS, 1 target, Vsky > 21.0 EE50 < 2.5
2 PSU02-2-050 HRS, 2 long visits on 2 possible dates, Vsky > 18.0, EE50 < 4.0
3 PSU02-2-046 sd39,sd50 HRS, 2 targets, Vsky > 20.5, EE50 < 2.7

STA02-2
RankProgramConstraints
1 STA02-3-001, CSBS 3674 3678 3697 3850 2699 LRS, Vsky > 21.0 , EE50 < 2.5

MUN02-2
RankProgramConstraints
-

G02-2
RankProgramConstraints
1 G02-3-001 LRS, Synoptic target every 4-6 days for entire trimester, Vsky > 18.5 , EE50 < 4.0



The following is a histogram of the current HET queue for the rest of the period. There are no obvious holes. The large number of priority 1 targets all lumped together is the synoptic program G02-3-001.

  • Future IC and Engineering: During the rest of this period there will be 9 nights of IC: 4 LRS nights, 3 HRS, and 3 MRS nights. No engineering is currently scheduled.
    TAC Response

    Larry Ramsey asked that in the next period that the Median exposure length be given in addition to the Average exposure length for the different instruments.

    Roger Romani asked that we include CSBS 1554 and CSBS 2292 in our high priority catagory for the coming weeks. Also we should try to hit CSBS 3674, 3678 & 3697 one after another to improve efficiency.

    Rob Robinson asked that we should observe Gary Hill's program UT02-3-008 as our next highest priority.

    The entire group agreed that by the end of the period that Munich and Penn State should be closer to their proportion of HET time.

    For the next TAC report we will put definitions of how the different fractions in the month by month summary are calculated.