HET Mid-Trimester Report
Third Period of 2005
August 1 - October 31

This report is composed of five sections:
Facility Status

In this section we will discuss the status of the HET facility and each instrument and any limitation to configurations that occurred during the period.


Observing Statistics

The following FWHM image quality statistics were taken from the LRS pre-imaging statistics and FIF acquisition guider for science operations in the night report. These are true FWHM measures using the same software on both the FIF acquisition guider and the LRS pre-images.

For comparison here is the LRS pre-imaging quality for the same period of 2004

Here are the DIMM values reported in the night report.

Month by Month Summary

The following table gives the observing statistics for each month. The second column gives the fraction of the month that was spent attempting science (as opposed to engineering or instrument commissioning). Science time is defined to begin at 18 degree twilight or the first science target. Science time is defined to end at 18 degree twilight or the last science target. The fourth column gives the fraction of the possible science time (A) lost due to weather. The fifth through seventh columns give the amount of remaining science time (after removing weather losses) not spent attempting science targets. Please note that the first stack of the night often occurs before 18 degree twilight.

Month A:Fraction of the Time that was Possible Science B:Average Night Length C:Fraction of Total Science Time Lost due to Weather D:Fraction of Actual Science Time Spent with Shutter Open D:Fraction of Actual Science Time Lost due to Overhead E:Fraction of Actual Science Time Lost due to Calibrations D:Fraction of Actual Science Time Lost due to Alignment F:Fraction of Actual Science Time Lost due to Problems Fraction of Actual Science Time Not accounted for or Lost
August 0.961 7.91 0.39 0.53 0.39 0.01 0.04 0.04 -0.01
September 0.975 8.98 0.55 0.50 0.32 0.01 0.05 0.10 0.02
October 0.981 9.92 0.53 0.53 0.37 0.01 0.05 0.03 0.01

The last column accounts for all of the minutes lost or not used. Some of this time is accounting errors, some is time not charged to any program due to operations inefficiency and some is due to uncharged overheads from observations that did not result in a fits file.

Details on Nightly cloud cover based on the TO's observations of the sky reported 3 times a night in the night report.:

Month Fraction of the Nights that were Clear Fraction of the Nights that were Mostly Clear Fraction of the Nights that were Partly Cloudy Fraction of the Nights that were Mostly Cloudy Fraction of the Nights that were Cloudy
August 0.07 0.16 0.36 0.19 0.16
September 0.27 0.27 0.30 0.07 0.10
October 0.32 0.16 0.19 0.03 0.29

Please note that the HET could be closed due to humidity, smoke or high dust count and still have a "Clear" statistic in the night report.

The following tables give a break down of all attempted visits as well as the category that each falls into.

Charged exposures
Number of TimesShutter Open (Hours)Type
791128.4 A - Acceptable
185.5 B - Acceptable but Border line conditions
27156.7 4 - Priority 4 visits (does not include 1/2 charge)
20.3 Q - charged but PI error
00.0 C - Acceptable by RA but PI rejects

Uncharged exposures
Number of TimesShutter Open (Hours)Type
71.2 I - Targets observed under otherwise idle conditions
91.4 E - Rejected by RA for Equipment Failure
194.8 H - Rejected for Human failure
204.4 W - Rejected by RA for Weather
103.0 P - Rejected by PI and confirmed by RA
20.8 N - Rejected due to unknown cause

So this is a total of 15.6 hours of uncharged spectra with an additional possible 5.5 hours of spectra that may be rejected.

The following overhead statistics include slew, setup, readout and refocus between exposures (if there are multiple exposures per visit). In the summary page for each program the average setup time is calculated. The table below gives the average setup time for each instrument PER VISIT and the average and maximum COMPLETED science exposures and visits.

The "Exposure" is defined by when the CCD opens and closes. A "Visit" is the requested total CCD shutter open time during a track and might be made up of several "Exposures". "Visit" as defined here contains no overhead. To calculate one type of observing efficiency metric one might divide the "Visit" by the sum of "Visit" + "Overhead".

The average overhead per actual visit is the overhead for each acceptable priority 0-3 (not borderline, and with overheads > 4 minutes to avoid 2nd half of exposures with unrealisticly low overheads) science target. This number reflects how quickly we can move from object to object on average for each instrument, however, this statistic tends to weight the overhead for programs with large number of targets such as planet search programs.

The average overhead per requested visit is the total charged overhead per requested priority 0-3 visit averaged per program. To get this value we average the average overhead for each program as presented in the program status web pages. The average overhead per visit can be inflated by extra overhead charged for PI mistakes (such as bad finding charts or no targets found at sky detection limits) or for incomplete visits e.g. 2 visits of 1800s are done instead of 1 visit with a CRsplit of 2. The average overhead per visit can be deflated by the 15 minute cap applied to the HRS and MRS. This method tends to weight the overhead to programs with few targets and bad requested visit lengths, ie. very close to the track length.

Instrument Avg Overhead per Actual Visit(min)Avg Overhead per Requested Visit(min) Avg Exposure (sec)Median Exposure (sec)Max Exposure (sec)Avg Visit (sec)Median Visit (sec)Max Visit (sec)
LRS 17.9 16.7 813.1 900 1800 1543.418007200
HRS 9.4 10.4 641.4 740 1826 712.17604020
MRS 12.3 11.0 839.0 600 2200 1146.0 840 2200

NOTE: AS OF 2003-3 THE SETUP TIME FOR AN ATTEMPTED MRS OR HRS TARGET IS CAPPED AT 15 MINUTES. AS OF 2004-3 THE SETUP TIME FOR AN ATTEMPTED LRS TARGET IS CAPPED AT 20 MINUTES.

The overhead statistics can be shortened by multiple setups (each one counted as a separate visit) while on the same target as is the case for planet search programs. The overhead statistics can be lengthened by having multiple tracks that add up to a single htopx visit as can happen for very long tracks where each attempt might only yield a half visit.

A way to improve the overhead accumulated for programs with long exposure times is to add double the above overhead to the requested visit length and make sure that time is shorter than the actual track length. This avoids the RA having to split requested visits between several different tracks.

During this period we have had some trouble with LRS setups which have turned out to be training issues.


Observing Programs Status

The following links give the summary for each institution and its programs. The resulting table will give (for each program) the total number of targets in the queue and the number completed, the CCD shutter open hours, average overhead for that program, and the TAC allocated time. This usually will be the best metric for judging completeness but there are times when a PI will tell us that a target is "done" before the total number of visits is complete.


Institution Status

This is how each institution has allocated its time by priority.

Time Allocation by Institution (hours)
Institution Priority 0 Priority 1 Priority 2Priority 3 Priority 4
PSU 11.170 (6%) 26.580 (15%) 34.660 (20%) 34.330 (20%) 67.750 (39%)
UT 14.500 (5%) 68.000 (22%) 79.500 (26%) 76.000 (24%) 65.000 (22%)
Stanford 5.000 (14%) 5.000 (14%) 10.000 (28%) 10.000 (28%) 5.000(14%)
Munich 0.000 (0%) 10.000 (29%) 14.000 (40%) 9.000 (26%) 2.000 (6%)
Goetting 0.000 (0%) 5.000 (26%) 8.000 (42%) 6.000 (32%) 0.000 (0%)
SALT 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000
DDT 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000

The following is a summary of the Acceptable CCD shutter time for each institution based on our htopx data base. It does not include any overhead. And does not weight based on any priority scheme (ie. priority 4 are counted at full cost).

CCD shutter Open by Institution (hours)
-TOTAL- Used % of All
PSU 76.974 43.7
UT 87.299 44.0
Stanford 30.667 7.1
Munich 2.975 2.2
Goetting 4.667 3.0
NOAO 17.790 --
SALT 0.000 --
DDT 0.000 --

NOTE: At the present time the Stanford lead SN project has not allocated any time to any of the partners so the entire allocation is currently charged to Stanford.

The following is a summary of the total charged time for each institution based on our htopx data base (for shutter open) and night reports (for overhead). It includes shutter open time (weighting priority four by half) and overhead.

Time Charged by Institution (hours)
-INST- Used THIS PERIOD % of All THIS PERIOD - % ALLOCATION TO DATE-
PSU 84.3 30.1% 29.93%
UT 137.9 49.4% 54.41%
Stanford 43.7 15.7% 6.65%
Munich 5.1 1.8% 4.49%
Goetting 8.3 3.0% 4.50%
NOAO N/A -- --
SALT 0.00 -- --
DDT 0.00 -- --


Total to Date starting from Oct 1999. Priority weighting for P4 began in the 2003-2 period.

NOTE: At the present time the Stanford lead SN project has not allocated any time to any of the partners so the entire allocation is currently charged to Stanford.


Future Priorities

The following are the high priority targets for the rest of the period for each institution:

UT05-3
RankProgram Constraints
1 UT05-3-006 several MMJ targets HRS, EE50 < 2.0, Vsky > 19.0
2 UT05-3-016 xmp52652-1193-592 HRS, EE50 < 3.0, Vsky > 19.0
3 UT05-3-013 ewok LRS, EE50 < 2.5, Vsky > 18.0

PSU05-3
RankProgramConstraints
1 PSU05-3-015 OJ287 LRS G2, EE50 < 2.0, Vsky > 20.4
2 PSU05-3-010 APM08279+5255 MRS EE50 < 2.0, Vsky > 20.4

STA05-3
RankProgramConstraints
1 STA05-3-002 TOO X0746+2549 LRS EE50 < 2.0, Vsky > 20.0
2 STA05-3-001 TOO SN LRS EE50 < 2.0, Vsky > 20.0

M05-3
RankProgramConstraints
1 M05-2-001 NGC2339 LRS e2 EE50 < 2.0, Vsky > 21.3,
2 M05-2-003 PGC3574 IC65_dw01 LRS g2 EE50 < 2.0, Vsky > 21.3,

G05-3
RankProgramConstraints
1 G05-2-001 Mrk926 LRS G2 EE50 < 4.0, Vsky > 18.0


The following is a histogram of the current HET queue visits for the rest of the period. A line has been drawn at the expected number of hour long visits that we hope to achieve in each hour bin.

The following histogram shows some of the extrema in observing conditions: good seeing dark time, bright time and bad seeing dark time. A line has been drawn at the expected number of hour long visits that we hope to achieve in each hour bin.

The following histogram shows the bright time priority 0-3 contribution from each partner. The dashed line is a rough estimate of the number of hour long visits one could complete during the remainder of the period.

The following histogram shows the dark time priority 0-3 contribution from each partner. The dashed line is a rough estimate of the number of hour long visits one could complete during the remainder of the period.

The following histogram shows the use of LRS_g2 vs. LRS_g3 for priority 0-2 programs in this period.

From the above plots I have determined that:

  • Future IC and Engineering: The current plan is to do 3% IC, 7% Engineering and 90% Science during the remainder of this trimester. Much of the engineering will be during bright time. We will have some significant LRS-J IC in grey time late in the trimester and some FIF IC in dark time in May.

    TAC Response